| 1 |
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> econf --with-extra-specs='{ "dynamic-linker", "/opt/gentoo/lib/ld-linux.so.2" }' |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> However, GNU autoconf/automake system automatically quote this to |
| 7 |
>> a string, while we want to pass an array of structures. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> There is an unquote macro and you can always use eval to expand once. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Ah, I see. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
>> Another solution is to prepend sysroot to dynamic linker, which is |
| 14 |
>> indifferent to the runtime-prefix patch from Google, criticized by you |
| 15 |
>> earlier. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> The Google patch is a step in a direction, just you could just unify |
| 18 |
> first and make it prefix-variable later |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Not sure if I understood your words. It is nearly impossible to |
| 21 |
prefixify the directories afterwards, as they are conditioned by |
| 22 |
-m32/-m64/-mx32, etc. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> instead of adding a prefix to all the custom patches scattered in the |
| 25 |
> codebase as it is now. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
>> Up to this point, the solution becomes complex and artificial. I |
| 29 |
>> would rather use the present patch'n'prefixify method, as we used |
| 30 |
>> in many ebuild, like: |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
>> --- gcc/config/i386/linux.h 2011-06-04 03:30:39.000000000 +0900 |
| 33 |
>> +++ gcc/config/i386/linux.h.new 2013-07-16 19:55:09.610399047 +0900 |
| 34 |
>> @@ -21,4 +21,4 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. |
| 35 |
>> <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */ |
| 36 |
>> |
| 37 |
>> #define GNU_USER_LINK_EMULATION "elf_i386" |
| 38 |
>> -#define GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER "/lib/ld-linux.so.2" |
| 39 |
>> +#define GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER "@GENTOO_PORTAGE_EPREFIX@/lib/ld-linux.so.2" |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> So first you patch the paths with something you can sed fill later. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Yes. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
> Works for me to get a result now. Then we can pester upstream |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
Exactly, http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52556 |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
> or just consider switching to clang (a different kind of pain to |
| 50 |
> bootstrap). |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
ok, I'll get my hands dirty with it. |
Archives