| 1 |
The g-pypi trunk has a TODO, which points out a way. |
| 2 |
http://code.google.com/p/g-pypi/source/browse/trunk/TODO |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Because each package has its own setup.py, and some of the |
| 5 |
dependence has declared there, Mr. Jesus Rivero and I haven't talk |
| 6 |
much about it yet. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
But There are still other problem. E.g the package name |
| 9 |
standard,and the way to make the ebuild name compatible to portage |
| 10 |
still need more consideration。My mentor and I have talked about it, |
| 11 |
but no dicision has been made.Maybe, we should change the name of PyPI |
| 12 |
package to work with portage. : ) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
LingKun |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o> wrote: |
| 17 |
> On 03/23/10 14:39, Ling Kun wrote: |
| 18 |
>> 2, More precise dependence manage. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> how would you implement that? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> sebastian |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
http://www.lingcc.com |
Archives