| 1 |
On 07/01/2013 05:18 PM, heroxbd wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hey Luca, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> writes: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> On 07/01/2013 04:48 PM, heroxbd wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>> Gentoo on Android is about running Gentoo natively in a directory prefix |
| 9 |
>>> on Android devices[1] in parallel with native Android, mentored by Luca. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> Progress report for the past 3 days, |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> 1. gcc specs hack is not that interesting as it first looks. |
| 14 |
>>> - parsing or generating specs script is no fun. |
| 15 |
>>> The best parser/generator is gcc itself |
| 16 |
>>> - appending simple specs (suches -dynamic-linker=/xx/xx.so) feel |
| 17 |
>>> not clever, appending --with-spec to configure either. |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>>> Therefore, I decide not to use specs hack as the main building |
| 20 |
>>> block. At the same time, it can be handy to do manual tuning |
| 21 |
>>> with it. |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> That must be reconsidered later to understand what's the problem and if |
| 24 |
>> upstream can help on that. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Got it. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
>>> Relying on binutils wrapper is no good either. The solution |
| 29 |
>>> finally falls on a mixed one between sysroot and native paths |
| 30 |
>>> methods (ref. table in [2]). Where I make use of eprefixify of |
| 31 |
>>> prefix.eclass to modify location of dynamic linker for *run |
| 32 |
>>> time* and sysroot for *compile time*. |
| 33 |
>> |
| 34 |
>> It isn't perfect, but as long it gives result I can live with that. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> The perfect solution is to use --with-runtime-root-prefix contributed by |
| 37 |
> Google[1][2], but not enough interest was gathered[3]. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
The patch itself is partially wrong (you might want to use a totally |
| 40 |
different layout) but surely looks interesting. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
lu |
Archives