| 1 |
06.04.2012 18:22, Brian Dolbec пишет: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 19:29 +0300, Slava Bacherikov wrote: |
| 3 |
>> 06.04.2012 16:14, Corentin Chary пишет: |
| 4 |
>>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Slava Bacherikov |
| 5 |
>>> <slava@××××××××××××××.ua> wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>> Hi. |
| 7 |
>>>> |
| 8 |
>>>> I'm student from Vinntsia National University in Ukraine. |
| 9 |
>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>> I've using Gentoo for a long time. |
| 11 |
>>>> I have expirience with PHP(Symphony, Yii), |
| 12 |
>>>> Python(Django, Flask, PyGTK, PyQt old api), JavaScript (JQuery and |
| 13 |
>>>> JQueryUI), |
| 14 |
>>>> C/C++(GTK and glade, QT, glib). |
| 15 |
>>>> I am new to GSOC. |
| 16 |
>>>> |
| 17 |
>>>> |
| 18 |
>>>> I've want to suggest idea to improve functionality of |
| 19 |
>>>> packages.gentoo.org and integrate it with gentoostats. |
| 20 |
>>>> I'll wrote a draft of my proposal |
| 21 |
>>>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/slava/1 |
| 22 |
>>>> , may be you can add some comments to it. |
| 23 |
>>>> |
| 24 |
>>> Hi Slava, |
| 25 |
>>> Since there are already multiple gentoostats proposal, and no |
| 26 |
>>> packages.gentoo.org, maybe you should split your proposal. |
| 27 |
>>> This way, even if yours is not taken for gentoostats, the |
| 28 |
>>> packages.gentoo.org proposal still have a chance. |
| 29 |
>>> Thanks, |
| 30 |
>>> |
| 31 |
>> Hi Corentin. |
| 32 |
>> Maybe you're right, i think that if i split this proposals, i will have |
| 33 |
>> more chances. |
| 34 |
>> But i don't want do this. And want explain why. |
| 35 |
>> In p.g.o I want get some statistics informations from site, users likes, |
| 36 |
>> how many views package information and other things. |
| 37 |
>> I think think develop these things separated from gentoostats not a good |
| 38 |
>> idea. |
| 39 |
>> My opinion is that p.g.o and gentoostats, doing very similar things. |
| 40 |
>> They provide information about the packages, but one about the |
| 41 |
>> statistics of their use and other metadata about it. It seems to me to |
| 42 |
>> provide full information about the packages is much better on one site |
| 43 |
>> than a few. |
| 44 |
>> |
| 45 |
>> |
| 46 |
> Slava, a p.g.o project can still be done separate from the gentoostats |
| 47 |
> project with some communication between the students and mentors. Whom |
| 48 |
> will agree on the information that will be available and the format it |
| 49 |
> will come as. It is also possible to work on the p.g.o information |
| 50 |
> display with only temp data, that the gentoostats project will |
| 51 |
> eventually provide. |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
> So please re-consider the split. |
| 54 |
Ok i'm done it. |
Archives