1 |
Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: |
2 |
>>> Maybe you could include the installed portage systems (portage, pkgcore, |
3 |
>>> paludis) :) |
4 |
>> As of now it works with portage only .. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I don't mean work with it, but list it as especially interesting information |
7 |
> :) |
8 |
|
9 |
Actually I had the same idea, too. |
10 |
|
11 |
I'm wondering if it should be done more in a generic way |
12 |
(as in top N for each category) or a selected way with hardcoded sets of |
13 |
packages to compare (selected package managers, selected audio players, |
14 |
selected text editors, ...) |
15 |
|
16 |
Extending the report generation code can takes quite some time so I try |
17 |
to understand as much as possible about the report's future before I |
18 |
actually do changes to it. |
19 |
|
20 |
I feel like we could use a "big vision" first to save me refactorings. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
Sebastian |