Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-soc
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-soc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-soc@g.o
From: Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab@...>
Subject: Re: Re: [gsoc-status] portage backend for PackageKit
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:54:31 +0200
Am Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2009 23:20:36 schrieb Mounir Lamouri:
> The backend is now ready. You should be able to do anything in a
> beta/realease candidate quality.

That is a damn interesting information. Sounds great! 

> - configuration file update

In the means of "cfg-update -u" or similar? 

> - messages / warning / errors show
> They are not critical for testing but only for a daily usage.



> I've already done the portage work for the first feature but I will have
> to add signal to packagekit because even if debian also needs it, it
> hasn't been implemented yet. The bad thing is GUI will probably not
> manage this feature since a quite long time.

(sorry if I sound dumb, just want to be sure I didn't misunderstand) does that 
mean that you'll be adding the config updating stuff to packagekit, so we'll 
have a cross-distro way of telling the package manager to update the configs? 

> About the packaging. I've worked on a packagekit ebuild and even if I
> didn't take time to add it to the tree it could be done without a lot of
> work but there is not real need at the moment because -as I said before-
> without a GUI, packagekit is quite useless and last version of
> gnome-packagekit needs a version gnome-policykit that is not in the tree.

Could you post the ebuild in here? 

I wanted to test KPackageKit since I saw it in Kubuntu :) 

- http://www.kde-apps.org/content/show.php/KPackageKit?content=84745

> After these two features, I will probably have some small things and
> bugs and I will move to big things for packagekit or portage needed to
> make the backend better. Indeed, there are a lot of things I've listed
> that are not really needed for a working backend and too big to be part
> of the gsoc. For example, merging layman into portage (actually, API
> will be easy but UI probably less) and having a non-verbose portage API
> because backends are using stdout for signals.

Wow, that sounds like great changes! 

Many thanks for tackling them! Gentoo might yet become useful for GUI-addicts 
;) 

> If by any chance, you test the backend, do not hesitate to contact me
> for bug reports or comments.

I don't know if I'll manage to grab enough time to do real testing, but I'll 
try. 

I asked for status, because I think that packagekit can be a huge step in 
usability for Gentoo, so I was curious how your project works out. 

Best wishes, 
Arne

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 
   - singing a part of the history of free software -
              http://infinite-hands.draketo.de

Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
Replies:
Re: Re: [gsoc-status] portage backend for PackageKit
-- Mounir Lamouri
References:
[gsoc-status] portage backend for PackageKit
-- Mounir Lamouri
Re: [gsoc-status] portage backend for PackageKit
-- Arne Babenhauserheide
Re: [gsoc-status] portage backend for PackageKit
-- Mounir Lamouri
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-soc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [gsoc-status] portage backend for PackageKit
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [gsoc-status] portage backend for PackageKit
Previous by date:
Re: [GSoC-status] Collagen - database schema and further changes
Next by date:
Re: Progress on Universal Select Tool


Updated Sep 12, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.