1 |
Hello! |
2 |
|
3 |
> The best way to keep portato going is to update it's use of portage. |
4 |
> One of the best ways to do that is to finish the new public_api and |
5 |
> change portato to use it. It at the very least needs the current code |
6 |
> updated to the current portage api. |
7 |
Is this means bugs.gentoo.org #136932? |
8 |
I checkout "public_api" branch and merge into "master" branch to try. |
9 |
|
10 |
> For tags support, there are also 2 indexed search utilities used by |
11 |
> users, eix and esearch. Also gentoolkit,s equery could also benefit |
12 |
> from tags support for it's searches. Eix being c++ and both esearch and |
13 |
> equery being python based. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> You should consider those as part of the work for tags support project. |
16 |
I think public_api will solve this problem. |
17 |
|
18 |
I thought the schedule the idea, "Tags support for Portage" is; |
19 |
1. Implement tags support for Portage |
20 |
2. Implement public_api for portage that cover all |
21 |
3. Implement eix, esearch and equery that use public_api which has |
22 |
been implemented in "2." |
23 |
|
24 |
If all milestones would have been implemented, to use Portage's |
25 |
function by other tools. |
26 |
|
27 |
How about this idea? |
28 |
|
29 |
Please point out :) |
30 |
|
31 |
Thanks. |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
2012/4/4 Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>: |
35 |
> On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 18:27 +0900, Ryuichi KAWAMATA wrote: |
36 |
>> Hello. |
37 |
>> |
38 |
>> > As was noted in the wiki, this idea is too small for a complete project |
39 |
>> > on it's own. You will need to add more to it in order for it to be |
40 |
>> > considered. |
41 |
>> I discussed this in gentoo-soc IRC yesterday. |
42 |
>> And, I decide to add another idea, "To implement tags support for Portato" |
43 |
>> |
44 |
>> I know CUI system is very useful because it can use over ssh, and |
45 |
>> normally it's lightly. |
46 |
>> But, if we need a system which has much information, I think GUI |
47 |
>> system is also good. |
48 |
>> Therefore, I propose this idea. |
49 |
>> |
50 |
>> I heard Portato developers are few too. |
51 |
>> So, I think this idea can help its developing. |
52 |
>> |
53 |
>> My goal in this GSoC idea is that; |
54 |
>> * To develop tags support for Portage |
55 |
>> * To develop tags support for Portato |
56 |
>> |
57 |
>> If there are some strange points in my plan, would you point it? |
58 |
>> |
59 |
>> Thanks! |
60 |
>> |
61 |
>> |
62 |
>> 2012/4/3 Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>: |
63 |
>> > On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 08:24 +0900, Ryuichi KAWAMATA wrote: |
64 |
>> >> Hello, everybody! |
65 |
>> >> |
66 |
>> >> My name is Ryuichi KAKWAMATA, a Japanese student. |
67 |
>> >> I'm a sophomore from April. |
68 |
>> >> (Japanese school starts from April to March. :D) |
69 |
>> >> I'm interesting in the idea "Tags support for Portage." |
70 |
>> >> |
71 |
>> >> I like portage because I think it's the cleverest package management system!! |
72 |
>> >> So, I use it in OSX as Gentoo Prefix too. |
73 |
>> >> |
74 |
>> >> Now, there is a idea to improve so, I want to develop it very much. |
75 |
>> >> I'm good at Python and C programming and knowledge about operating systems. |
76 |
>> >> |
77 |
>> >> I want to learn the OSS community and help it too. |
78 |
>> >> |
79 |
>> >> Thanks! |
80 |
>> >> |
81 |
>> > |
82 |
>> > Thank you for your interest. |
83 |
>> > |
84 |
>> > As was noted in the wiki, this idea is too small for a complete project |
85 |
>> > on it's own. You will need to add more to it in order for it to be |
86 |
>> > considered. |
87 |
>> > |
88 |
>> > You might want to consider adding both eix and esearch to your proposal |
89 |
>> > to add tags support to their fast search db's. I would be your contact |
90 |
>> > for work done to esearch. Contact the upstream developer to discuss |
91 |
>> > adding tags support to eix. |
92 |
>> > |
93 |
>> > That will still likely not be enough to make it a complete project, so |
94 |
>> > you will need to come up with some additional work to do. Preferably in |
95 |
>> > the same realm of work as the above, mostly portage. One idea I have |
96 |
>> > would be to complete work on the portage public_api that was started but |
97 |
>> > needs additional work to complete. That idea could fill in the project |
98 |
>> > timeline. Contact me directly if you wish to discuss it further. |
99 |
>> > -- |
100 |
>> > Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> |
101 |
>> |
102 |
>> |
103 |
>> |
104 |
> |
105 |
> Something else I forgot to mention. |
106 |
> |
107 |
> For tags support, there are also 2 indexed search utilities used by |
108 |
> users, eix and esearch. Also gentoolkit,s equery could also benefit |
109 |
> from tags support for it's searches. Eix being c++ and both esearch and |
110 |
> equery being python based. |
111 |
> |
112 |
> You should consider those as part of the work for tags support project. |
113 |
> -- |
114 |
> Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> |
115 |
|
116 |
|
117 |
|
118 |
-- |
119 |
""" """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ |
120 |
川又 龍一 |
121 |
(Ryuichi KAWAMATA) |
122 |
筑波大学 ��霾鶻愀� ��霾鷁奮慘� |
123 |
(Univ. Tsukuba, College of Information Science) |
124 |
TEL : 080-2594-3539 |
125 |
""" """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ |