Gentoo Archives: gentoo-soc

From: Ryuichi KAWAMATA <mail@×××××××.net>
To: gentoo-soc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] [GSoC2012] Interested in Tags support for Portage
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:09:48
Message-Id: CAF3hW-j15U9q8sVw7fRwFXVSJSycYRj-+qOqE=oTMKESVCSBDA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-soc] [GSoC2012] Interested in Tags support for Portage by Brian Dolbec
1 Hello!
2
3 > The best way to keep portato going is to update it's use of portage.
4 > One of the best ways to do that is to finish the new public_api and
5 > change portato to use it. It at the very least needs the current code
6 > updated to the current portage api.
7 Is this means bugs.gentoo.org #136932?
8 I checkout "public_api" branch and merge into "master" branch to try.
9
10 > For tags support, there are also 2 indexed search utilities used by
11 > users, eix and esearch. Also gentoolkit,s equery could also benefit
12 > from tags support for it's searches. Eix being c++ and both esearch and
13 > equery being python based.
14 >
15 > You should consider those as part of the work for tags support project.
16 I think public_api will solve this problem.
17
18 I thought the schedule the idea, "Tags support for Portage" is;
19 1. Implement tags support for Portage
20 2. Implement public_api for portage that cover all
21 3. Implement eix, esearch and equery that use public_api which has
22 been implemented in "2."
23
24 If all milestones would have been implemented, to use Portage's
25 function by other tools.
26
27 How about this idea?
28
29 Please point out :)
30
31 Thanks.
32
33
34 2012/4/4 Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>:
35 > On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 18:27 +0900, Ryuichi KAWAMATA wrote:
36 >> Hello.
37 >>
38 >> > As was noted in the wiki, this idea is too small for a complete project
39 >> > on it's own. You will need to add more to it in order for it to be
40 >> > considered.
41 >> I discussed this in gentoo-soc IRC yesterday.
42 >> And, I decide to add another idea, "To implement tags support for Portato"
43 >>
44 >> I know CUI system is very useful because it can use over ssh, and
45 >> normally it's lightly.
46 >> But, if we need a system which has much information, I think GUI
47 >> system is also good.
48 >> Therefore, I propose this idea.
49 >>
50 >> I heard Portato developers are few too.
51 >> So, I think this idea can help its developing.
52 >>
53 >> My goal in this GSoC idea is that;
54 >> * To develop tags support for Portage
55 >> * To develop tags support for Portato
56 >>
57 >> If there are some strange points in my plan, would you point it?
58 >>
59 >> Thanks!
60 >>
61 >>
62 >> 2012/4/3 Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>:
63 >> > On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 08:24 +0900, Ryuichi KAWAMATA wrote:
64 >> >> Hello, everybody!
65 >> >>
66 >> >> My name is Ryuichi KAKWAMATA, a Japanese student.
67 >> >> I'm a sophomore from April.
68 >> >> (Japanese school starts from April to March. :D)
69 >> >> I'm interesting in the idea "Tags support for Portage."
70 >> >>
71 >> >> I like portage because I think it's the cleverest package management system!!
72 >> >> So, I use it in OSX as Gentoo Prefix too.
73 >> >>
74 >> >> Now, there is a idea to improve so, I want to develop it very much.
75 >> >> I'm good at Python and C programming and knowledge about operating systems.
76 >> >>
77 >> >> I want to learn the OSS community and help it too.
78 >> >>
79 >> >> Thanks!
80 >> >>
81 >> >
82 >> > Thank you for your interest.
83 >> >
84 >> > As was noted in the wiki, this idea is too small for a complete project
85 >> > on it's own. You will need to add more to it in order for it to be
86 >> > considered.
87 >> >
88 >> > You might want to consider adding both eix and esearch to your proposal
89 >> > to add tags support to their fast search db's. I would be your contact
90 >> > for work done to esearch. Contact the upstream developer to discuss
91 >> > adding tags support to eix.
92 >> >
93 >> > That will still likely not be enough to make it a complete project, so
94 >> > you will need to come up with some additional work to do. Preferably in
95 >> > the same realm of work as the above, mostly portage. One idea I have
96 >> > would be to complete work on the portage public_api that was started but
97 >> > needs additional work to complete. That idea could fill in the project
98 >> > timeline. Contact me directly if you wish to discuss it further.
99 >> > --
100 >> > Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>
101 >>
102 >>
103 >>
104 >
105 > Something else I forgot to mention.
106 >
107 > For tags support, there are also 2 indexed search utilities used by
108 > users, eix and esearch. Also gentoolkit,s equery could also benefit
109 > from tags support for it's searches. Eix being c++ and both esearch and
110 > equery being python based.
111 >
112 > You should consider those as part of the work for tags support project.
113 > --
114 > Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>
115
116
117
118 --
119 """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """
120 川又 龍一
121 (Ryuichi KAWAMATA)
122 筑波大学 ��霾鶻愀� ��霾鷁奮慘�
123 (Univ. Tsukuba, College of Information Science)
124 TEL : 080-2594-3539
125 """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """ """

Replies