| 1 |
On 01/26/2016 07:20 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 26 Jan 2016 18:30, Alex McWhirter wrote: |
| 3 |
>> If using symlink_lib=no, shoud 32bit libraries be placed in lib32 or |
| 4 |
>> lib? If we use lib32 we need to modify the base layout to compensate for |
| 5 |
>> this. |
| 6 |
> there should be no lib32 under sparc. /usr/lib/ holds 32-bit libs |
| 7 |
> just like a 32-bit install, and /usr/lib64/ holds 64-bit libs. |
| 8 |
> -mike |
| 9 |
The sparc multilib profile overrides this and uses lib32 with a symlink. |
| 10 |
But using lib is probably a better option as it seems like the way |
| 11 |
everything else works. |
Archives