| 1 |
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 10:58 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 15:16 +0000, Ferris McCormick wrote: |
| 3 |
> > With x11-base/xorg-server-0.99.1-r5, the missing sparc-specific source |
| 4 |
> > files are no longer missing, and one build cycle runs successfully. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Is this specific to the eselect module and not the 2.x series? Do you |
| 9 |
> have the eselect-opengl-1.0.1? There was a bug in 1.0.0 that looks like |
| 10 |
> what you describe, and I fixed it in 1.0.1 before removing it from |
| 11 |
> package.mask... but I did the commits about the same time, so I suppose |
| 12 |
> there could've been a concurrency issue... |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Please verify that you have eselect-opengl-1.0.1. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
That was it. eselect-opengl-1.0.1.ebuild made it onto my system after I |
| 23 |
started the testing cycle in question, and I didn't notice the change. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thanks, |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
| 28 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel) |
Archives