Gentoo Archives: gentoo-sparc

From: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>
To: Zhang Weiwu <zhangweiwu@××××××.com>
Cc: Leif Sawyer <lsawyer@×××.com>, gentoo-sparc@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-sparc] what ultrasparc compare likely such Pentium bo x on desktop performance
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 12:44:58
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.61.0412021240560.16583@lacewing.inforead.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-sparc] what ultrasparc compare likely such Pentium bo x on desktop performance by Zhang Weiwu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Zhang Weiwu wrote:

> Leif Sawyer wrote: > >> Oh, I guess I should state that sloccount isn't marked for ~sparc, but >> compiles and works perfectly. Dunno if somebody wants to tag it. :-) >> >> > Yes I noticed it. Becuase sloccount is an purely console tool written in > standard language, I don't expect any trouble if I run it on sparc, so I > guess this is simple a mistake, or the ebuild maker doesn't test it anyway. > Currently I don't know how to tag or report this bug. I'll read a bit the > gentoo handbook to learn to contact those who is responsible. >
Normally, in a situation like this, just create a bug to the effect that XXX works for me on {whatever it works for you on}, please add ~sparc keyword. And assign it to sparc@g.o In this case, I'll look at it for you without a bug, however.
> -- > gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list > >
- -- Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBrw5CQa6M3+I///cRAnBSAKCBvehZEJxfZj9q+c/tjr1zw4/upwCgsue3 dPpVCUrn1p7Ag+YgIgaipzM= =Cvbc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list