1 |
hmm, interesting ... I admit, it's been a few months since I've tried, |
2 |
but when I did, I eventually gave up and got hold of the old 2.6.6 |
3 |
tree. Like Ciaran said, it's likely just the difference in hardware |
4 |
because the machine I have here that runs gentoo is a U60 while the |
5 |
one at work is a U5. That said though, I did run a very stable 2.6 |
6 |
kernel on this very same U60 a few months back in debian. What this |
7 |
line of thought leads to though is that debian gives you the most |
8 |
universally working 2.6 kernel version levels by default, so I must |
9 |
now ask: who out there runs a stable 2.6 kernel on a U60, so I'll know |
10 |
what version works best on it? |
11 |
|
12 |
All that said, it is good to know now that there's more cooperation |
13 |
between the sparc porting developers than I'd previously thought. |
14 |
Thanks guys. |
15 |
|
16 |
jbw |
17 |
|
18 |
On 9/17/05, Andrew Ruef <munin@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
19 |
> What problems do you face running 2.6 using Gentoo sources? For the longest |
20 |
> time I was using 2.6.11-hardened-r15 before switching to a custom version of |
21 |
> 2.6.13, I had no issues... |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Andrew Ruef |
24 |
> |
25 |
> -----Original Message----- |
26 |
> From: Jason Williams [mailto:jason.b.williams@×××××.com] |
27 |
> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 8:14 PM |
28 |
> To: Gentoo Sparc |
29 |
> Subject: [gentoo-sparc] 2.6 kernel development |
30 |
> |
31 |
> It seems to me that there's a problem in cooperation between |
32 |
> distributions that port the linux kernel to sparc. The reason I say |
33 |
> this is, I run a very stable web/mail server on a sparc at work that |
34 |
> is running debian with a 2.6.8 kernel. However, in gentoo I've not |
35 |
> been able to get a 2.6 kernel that's currently in portage running, |
36 |
> much less stable. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> The dilemma here is that I much prefer gentoo sparc in every other |
39 |
> respect than the kernel (well maybe speed of getting a running system, |
40 |
> but that I understand and am willing to deal with - that's gentoo in |
41 |
> general;-). Why is it that their 2.6 kernel is so great while gentoo's |
42 |
> is so unstable? |
43 |
> |
44 |
> Anyways, that said, I have a question. Since the debian sparc 2.6 |
45 |
> kernel seems so stable is there any reason why I can't just take their |
46 |
> source tree and compile it in gentoo? It seems to me that this would |
47 |
> be the best solution to my dilemma. It'd essentially just be a way of |
48 |
> taking advantage of their one advantage over gentoo sparc. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> jbw |
51 |
> |
52 |
> -- |
53 |
> gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list |
54 |
> |
55 |
> |
56 |
> |
57 |
> -- |
58 |
> gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list |
59 |
> |
60 |
> |
61 |
|
62 |
-- |
63 |
gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list |