1 |
There's a couple of fairly recent discussions in the forums about snort on Sparc: |
2 |
|
3 |
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-314212.html |
4 |
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-456504.html |
5 |
|
6 |
>From what I see there, the package is masked because it's broken on Sparc. |
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
That was a couple of months ago, though, so things may have changed. |
10 |
|
11 |
Ralph Mitchell |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
-----Original Message----- |
15 |
From: gentuxx [mailto:gentuxx@×××××.com] |
16 |
Sent: Thu 8/3/2006 2:57 AM |
17 |
To: gentoo-sparc@l.g.o |
18 |
Subject: [gentoo-sparc] Snort? |
19 |
|
20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
21 |
Hash: SHA1 |
22 |
|
23 |
I noticed this: |
24 |
|
25 |
* net-analyzer/snort |
26 |
Available versions: -2.4.5 [M]2.6.0 |
27 |
Installed: none |
28 |
Homepage: http://www.snort.org/ |
29 |
Description: Libpcap-based packet |
30 |
sniffer/logger/lightweight IDS |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
I'm not sure what '-' and '[M]' means in eix, quite yet. (I've just |
34 |
started using eix.) I also noticed in packages.gentoo.org that it |
35 |
isn't even on the map for sparc. So, am I stuck with downloading the |
36 |
sources, and managing it outside of portage? I'd really rather not do |
37 |
that. Is it really that unstable? Or is there just no one to build |
38 |
the ebuild for sparc? If it's the latter, I might be able to help, |
39 |
but I'd like some insight before I go diving into a project like that. |
40 |
|
41 |
Thanks. |
42 |
|
43 |
- -- |
44 |
gentux |
45 |
echo "hfouvyyAhnbjm/dpn" | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge' |
46 |
|
47 |
gentux's gpg fingerprint ==> 5495 0388 67FF 0B89 1239 D840 4CF0 39E2 |
48 |
18D3 4A9E |
49 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
50 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) |
51 |
|
52 |
iD8DBQFE0ax+TPA54hjTSp4RAp/7AKCW0Jxg5PX9TG6WBZahgvPBHg3SnQCfcWJ6 |
53 |
zOJ5WWUt800rox67LkOaLEo= |
54 |
=eAIr |
55 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
56 |
|
57 |
-- |
58 |
gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list |