| 1 |
On 01/09/2016 03:34 AM, Alex McWhirter wrote: |
| 2 |
> The sparc port seems to be aging, in particular the installation ISO and |
| 3 |
> stage 3 archives. I'd like to propose a few things and get some opinions. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> 1. We need new stage 3 libraries and installation ISO's. That's probably |
| 6 |
> a given. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> 2. We need a stage 3 with a 64bit userland. Thanks to Oracle, we now |
| 9 |
> have kernel / driver support for many newer sparc boxes that can utilize |
| 10 |
> large amounts of ram and don't see much of a performance reduction by |
| 11 |
> running 64bit code. I don't think killing the 32bit userland single-lib |
| 12 |
> archive is a good idea as some people probably see much better |
| 13 |
> performance on older boxes. However, we could set the multilib profile |
| 14 |
> to default to 64bit with 32bit backwards compatibility. We could also |
| 15 |
> just make new stage 3 profile / profiles. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> 3. Maybe we should consider finalizing the multilib profile, and make it |
| 18 |
> look more like the x86 profile as far as functionality is concerned. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I figure there aren't a lot of people around here, but i am willing to |
| 21 |
> start doing all of this by myself. Who knows, maybe we can attract a few |
| 22 |
> more developers if the port gets a bit more aligned with the rest of |
| 23 |
> gentoo. I have quite a few machines at my disposal. A few V215's, |
| 24 |
> T1000's, M4000's, T5120's, Netra X1's, and probably a few more that i |
| 25 |
> can't think of at the moment. I plan on setting myself up a few build |
| 26 |
> servers, anyone else who wants to help is welcome to an account on them. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
New installation ISO's sounds like a plan, when I installed my gentoo in |
| 30 |
an LDOM, I had to use an ISO from 2009. But I think also the binutils |
| 31 |
package might need some work. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-kp |
Archives