Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-sparc
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-sparc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-sparc@g.o
From: brant williams <brant@...>
Subject: Re: emerging of silo fails
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:26:50 -0500 (CDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


In doing some quick google searches, nothing came up in the way of running 
2.6 on a SPARCStation.  How about trying this (as previously suggested by 
Martin, albeit pretty far down in his post... ;)

rm /etc/make.profile

ln -s /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/sparc/sparc32/2006.1/2.4 /etc/make.profile

emerge --sync       # if you haven't yet

emerge -uDav world

emerge -av silo


brant williams
FCAA CDCA 20BC 3925 D634  F5C4 7420 6784 4DEB 6002



On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Aggelos wrote:

> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:42:52 +0300
> From: Aggelos <marmango@...>
> Reply-To: gentoo-sparc@g.o
> To: gentoo-sparc@g.o
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-sparc] emerging of silo fails
> 
> Thanks a lot for your help Martin. ;)
> As I said in previous replies, the only problem I face keeping me from
> moving to kernel 2.6 is its un-bootable size for sparc32.
>
> If there is a user running a 2.6 kernel on a sparcstation5 or the like,
> I would appreciate it if he can post his .config.
>
> Aggelos.
>
> on 09/18/2007 12:11 AM Dereck Martin wrote the following:
>> Like I said before, I highly recommend you just use the latest profile
>> for the sparc it will give you a 2.6 kernel and such.  I don't know the
>> reasons why you still need a 2.4 kernel, but if you do still need it
>> here is how I would go about setting up a overlay for an older profile.
>>
>> with an overlay, an emerge --sync doesn't wipe out the profiles or
>> packages so it remains in a static state.
>>
>> I also highly recommend you read the documentation for creating and
>> managing ebuilds.  Chances are you will need to do "ebuild
>> filename.ebuild digest" and some other things when doing this method.
>>
>> I also for warn that this is probably not a desirable method, but if you
>> really want to keep your system in a old profile that isn't maintained
>> it is about the only way to do so.
>>
>> Well if you are looking to preserve an older profile like the recently
>> removed 2006.0 profile, you have to get a portage snapshot of a 2006.0
>> profile.
>>
>> Most of the mirrors have removed the 2006.0 profile, but some haven't
>> yet.  A good example would be
>>
>>
>> http://gentoo.mirrors.tds.net/gentoo/releases/snapshots/2006.0/portage-20060123.tar.bz2
>>
>> Download that portage snapshot and perform the following commands
>>
>> cd /usr/local
>> mkdir portage
>> mv /dir-to-downloaded-snapshot/portage-20060123.tar.bz2 .
>> tar xjf portage-20060123.tar.bz2
>>
>> this will create a portage structure in /usr/local/portage what gentoo
>> calls a portage overlay.
>>
>> Then  echo PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage" >> /etc/make.conf
>>
>> This will tell portage to recognize the overlay when using emerge and
>> stuff.
>>
>> Then create a symlink to the 2006.0 profile in the
>> /usr/local/portage/profiles directory instead of the regular
>> /usr/portage/profiles
>>
>> So it would be like this
>>
>> rm /etc/make.profile
>> ln -s /usr/local/portage/profiles/<path to profile> /etc/make.profile
>>
>> The only draw back is when you try to emerge certain apps that have been
>> completely removed form the current portage distfiles you'll have to
>> find the file else where and place it in the distfiles your self.  This
>> is common for patches and such.  Most of the time the ebuild has various
>> locations to retrieve the file, and you will have to cross your fingers
>> and hope it is in one of the locations.  =)
>>
>> I recommend scouring the gentoo SVN and looking at all ebuild files
>> including the deleted ones and downloading the required patches by hand
>> found in the "files" directory of the application package you are
>> wanting. You will need to do this if an ebuild is unmaintained, like in
>> the instance of openMosix
>>
>> In writing this i noticed that the sparc32 2006.1 profile has a 2.4
>> kernel profile.  So you should be good to go at least until next year
>> probably.  Make sure you /etc/make.profile is linked to that profile
>> first and if it is not then you might resolve a lot of problems by doing
>> that.
>>
>> A lot of people do this on a per application basis.  Like my self.  I
>> basically just do this for openMosix and delete all the other data out
>> of the portage overlay except the openMosix stuff and the profile.
> -- 
> gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG7v8qdCBnhE3rYAIRCBPkAJ4i82lHP3wqWYQ0Ut/Ahv4V248YtQCffjHK
nvjvccP/Kw7SO15+gWSRITE=
=E5h5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list


Replies:
Re: emerging of silo fails
-- Aggelos
References:
emerging of silo fails
-- Aggelos
Re: emerging of silo fails
-- Andrew Gaffney
Re: emerging of silo fails
-- Aggelos
Re: emerging of silo fails
-- brant williams
Re: emerging of silo fails
-- Dereck Martin
Re: emerging of silo fails
-- Aggelos
Re: emerging of silo fails
-- Dereck Martin
Re: emerging of silo fails
-- Aggelos
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-sparc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: emerging of silo fails
Next by thread:
Re: emerging of silo fails
Previous by date:
Re: emerging of silo fails
Next by date:
Re: emerging of silo fails


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-sparc mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.