| 1 |
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I thought that check was only in portage-2.1, but regaradless, |
| 4 |
> exectuable stacks are not yet fixable on sparc to my knowledge ( |
| 5 |
> talked to vapier about it a bit ago ) and sparc is not checked for |
| 6 |
> executable stacks in the trunk of portage, but that fix has not yet |
| 7 |
> been released. In conclusion, ignore it because it can't |
| 8 |
> necessarily be fixed on sparc anyhow ;) |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> This is another example of blatantly irresponsible behaviour from a |
| 13 |
> few of our hardened developers. The warning is nonsense and should |
| 14 |
> be ignored. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Thanks, Alec and Ciaran, for your prompt and clear replies! |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Paul Heinlein <> heinlein@××××××.com <> www.madboa.com |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list |
Archives