| 1 |
is there any down side to the 2.4 approach? does it do the same stuff? |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 2/20/06, freshy98 <freshy98@×××.net> wrote: |
| 4 |
> Oh nice! I will try that one my self instead of the 2.4 approach. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Tom |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Gustavo Zacarias wrote: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 12 |
> >Hash: SHA1 |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> >Nick Smith wrote: |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> >>can you do LVM on sparc? the dm-mod module for it doesnt seem to |
| 19 |
> >>exsist on the install cd. how do you go about using it with sparc if |
| 20 |
> >>it can be done? |
| 21 |
> >> |
| 22 |
> >> |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> >Yeah, dm-mod is a 2.6 (and lvm2) thingie. |
| 25 |
> >For 2.4 you use lvm-user (instead of lvm2) and lvm-mod (instead of dm-mod). |
| 26 |
> >If you want 2.6/lvm2 you can try my experimental (as in doesn't work on |
| 27 |
> >many machine models and i know and i'm not about to fix it atm since |
| 28 |
> >it's silo having issues) livecd @ |
| 29 |
> >http://dev.gentoo.org/~gustavoz/sparc/experimental/ |
| 30 |
> > |
| 31 |
> >- -- |
| 32 |
> >Gustavo Zacarias |
| 33 |
> >Gentoo/SPARC monkey |
| 34 |
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 35 |
> >Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) |
| 36 |
> >Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 37 |
> > |
| 38 |
> >iD8DBQFD+gkWV3G/IBCn/JARAsanAJ94mWj7W+uTYcgGxyb3PvcgJbDF7wCfevzy |
| 39 |
> >eSJ2zMC+tVwsBE+3bJylN2I= |
| 40 |
> >=HFP4 |
| 41 |
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 42 |
> > |
| 43 |
> > |
| 44 |
> -- |
| 45 |
> gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
> |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
-- |
| 51 |
Linux, because I'd rather own a free OS than steal one that's not |
| 52 |
worth paying for. |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
-- |
| 55 |
gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list |
Archives