Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-sparc
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-sparc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Gentoo Sparc <gentoo-sparc@g.o>
From: Jason Williams <jason.b.williams@...>
Subject: 2.6 kernel development
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 20:14:22 -0500
It seems to me that there's a problem in cooperation between
distributions that port the linux kernel to sparc. The reason I say
this is, I run a very stable web/mail server on a sparc at work that
is running debian with a 2.6.8 kernel. However, in gentoo I've not
been able to get a 2.6 kernel that's currently in portage running,
much less stable.

The dilemma here is that I much prefer gentoo sparc in every other
respect than the kernel (well maybe speed of getting a running system,
but that I understand and am willing to deal with - that's gentoo in
general;-). Why is it that their 2.6 kernel is so great while gentoo's
is so unstable?

Anyways, that said, I have a question. Since the debian sparc 2.6
kernel seems so stable is there any reason why I can't just take their
source tree and compile it in gentoo? It seems to me that this would
be the best solution to my dilemma. It'd essentially just be a way of
taking advantage of their one advantage over gentoo sparc.

jbw

-- 
gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list


Replies:
RE: 2.6 kernel development
-- Andrew Ruef
Re: 2.6 kernel development
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-sparc: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
xorg device problems
Next by thread:
Re: 2.6 kernel development
Previous by date:
Re: xorg device problems
Next by date:
Re: 2.6 kernel development


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-sparc mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.