| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, David S. Miller wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> From: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o> |
| 7 |
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 21:35:48 +0000 |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>> I'm running it on U2(2x400) currently with 2.6.14-U2-2x400-g393b0725. |
| 10 |
>> So far, it's doing fine, and this is on a system which has never been |
| 11 |
>> stable with a 2.6 kernel. With this kernel + IRQ patch, though, it's |
| 12 |
>> stayed up through a lot of stress tests which I would have expected |
| 13 |
>> would have killed it. |
| 14 |
>> (But uptime is only 6 hours so far). |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> It would be interesting to know if that exact kernel, |
| 17 |
> but without the IRQ stacks patch, works just as well. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> It's nice that it's stable, but we should find out exactly |
| 20 |
> why :-) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
If the system is still up Monday and if no one else has reported on the U2 |
| 23 |
(and U1) stability, I'll try to make a test using Josh Grebe's (squash's) |
| 24 |
crashme script against that kernel with the IRQ patch removed. I can't |
| 25 |
give a good estimate of when the test will be possible because Monday |
| 26 |
morning the U2 will be helping with a fairly lengthy upgrade unrelated to |
| 27 |
the kernel. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Regards, |
| 30 |
Ferris |
| 31 |
- -- |
| 32 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
| 33 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (sparc, devrel) |
| 34 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 35 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
iD8DBQFDdVpgQa6M3+I///cRAoh6AKCHJfFYVWRISLfpB4SSRSeE3CdPbACgtxnF |
| 38 |
FloXJHIgbtQvu2IYtXgDAoY= |
| 39 |
=lxeP |
| 40 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list |
Archives