| 1 |
Ok, you said this was a u2, right? So I assume you have SMP enabled, |
| 2 |
and that causes lockups on all 2.6.x kernels. If you don't have SMP |
| 3 |
enabled, please let me know as I've been unable to lockup 2.6.7-r17 or |
| 4 |
2.6.8-r11 (not sure if dsd put it in portage yet, but it should be |
| 5 |
marked -sparc when he does for testing) on my u10. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
So this is more of a qualitative thing, but was it "easier" to lockup |
| 8 |
2.6.7 than it was to lockup 2.6.6? That's what I've been hearing, but |
| 9 |
I'd like a side-by-side comparison... |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If that's the case, would you be willing to test out 2.6.7-rc1 and |
| 12 |
2.6.7-rc2 and help narrow down when the lockup was introduced... |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 11:47 -0900, Leif Sawyer wrote: |
| 15 |
> Decided to stress-test the system: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Jeremy Huddleston <eradicator@g.o> |
Archives