1 |
I thought that check was only in portage-2.1, but regaradless, |
2 |
exectuable stacks are not yet fixable on sparc to my knowledge ( talked |
3 |
to vapier about it a bit ago ) and sparc is not checked for executable |
4 |
stacks in the trunk of portage, but that fix has not yet been released. |
5 |
In conclusion, ignore it because it can't necessarily be fixed on sparc |
6 |
anyhow ;) |
7 |
|
8 |
Paul Heinlein wrote: |
9 |
|
10 |
> Recently, I've been getting warnings during emerge sessions on my |
11 |
> Blade 100 (2.4 kernel, sparc64/2005.1 profile): |
12 |
> |
13 |
> QA Notice: the following files contain executable stacks |
14 |
> Files with executable stacks will not work properly (or at all!) |
15 |
> on some architectures/operating systems. A bug should be filed |
16 |
> at http://bugs.gentoo.org/ to make sure the file is fixed. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Nothing seems broken, and so far I've ignored them, but I'm wondering |
19 |
> if I should be paying closer attention here... |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list |