Gentoo Archives: gentoo-sparc

From: Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@×××××××××××.com>
To: Jason Wever <weeve@g.o>
Cc: Gentoo Sparc Mailing List <gentoo-sparc@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-sparc] Dueling ebuilds?
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:51:11
Message-Id: 417FC1D3.7060203@skylineaero.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-sparc] Dueling ebuilds? by Jason Wever
1 Jason Wever wrote:
2 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
3 > Hash: SHA1
4 >
5 > On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Paul Heinlein wrote:
6 >
7 >> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Jason Wever wrote:
8 >>
9 >>> If you're only using 2.4, you can keep using modutils. However if
10 >>> you use 2.6, or want to flip back and forth from 2.4 to 2.6, you can
11 >>> use module-init-tools (as long as the "no-old-linux" use flag is
12 >>> *NOT* enabled (aren't double negatives fun :-P))
13 >>
14 >>
15 >> Is there any estimate as to when 2.6 will be marked stable for sparc64?
16 >
17 >
18 > Well, the problem we run into here is typically the quality of the 2.6
19 > kernels isn't that great on sparc64 (though a lot better than sparc32).
20 > We've been hesitant to mark any of them stable because while some may
21 > work fine on some machines, they don't on others (i.e. 2.6.6 runs fine
22 > on a Blade 100 but locks up consistently on an Ultra 2).
23
24 Maybe you're Ultra 2 just doesn't like you :) My U2 has been using kernel 2.6.6
25 for atleast a month since I did the initial install and I haven't had a problem.
26 Currently, its uptime is 11 days (since the last time the power went out here).
27 Although, it isn't doing much. The U2 is only acting as the router for my cable
28 internet connection.
29
30 --
31 Andrew Gaffney
32 Network Administrator
33 Skyline Aeronautics, LLC.
34 636-357-1548
35
36
37 --
38 gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-sparc] Dueling ebuilds? Jason Wever <weeve@g.o>