1 |
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 03:14:58 +0000 (UTC) |
2 |
Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
5 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
6 |
> |
7 |
> OK, I've been thinking about this, and here is what we have. |
8 |
> (1) Some U1/U2 systems do very well on these kernels; |
9 |
> (2) Some are unusable: I have one which on 2.6.xx, has mean time |
10 |
> between (very hard lock) failure of about a day, on kernel-2.4.32, |
11 |
> it's never (literally). |
12 |
> (3) Weeve and (I believe) squash are as in point 2. |
13 |
|
14 |
Yes, I have an Ultra 2 (2x300, 2GB RAM) and an Ultra 1 (143MHz, 448MB |
15 |
RAM) that can readily be locked up with what appears to be the I/O |
16 |
issue. In both cases, neither running the systems with a serial |
17 |
console or graphical console reveals anything when they lock up |
18 |
(even with the syslog daemon turned off). |
19 |
|
20 |
For both systems, I've tried kernels built with gcc-3.4.5 and gcc-3.3.6 |
21 |
and the only possible difference is that it *seems* to take longer to |
22 |
crash on the gcc-3.4.5 built kernels (but let me generate some data to |
23 |
back that up). |
24 |
|
25 |
Cheers, |
26 |
-- |
27 |
Jason Wever |
28 |
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead |