| 1 |
Ferris McCormick wrote in response to |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 08:28 -0500, Jameel Akari wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Ferris McCormick wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>>> However, U2-SMP(2x450) is not. As is the case with ALL 2.6.xx |
| 6 |
>>> kernels,2.6.15-r4 cannot handle the sort of disk activity which |
| 7 |
>>> portage requires |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> If you have 400MHz/2MB CPUs sitting around it may be worth testing |
| 10 |
>> with them to isolate that as a cause. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> As is too often the case, I mistyped. The stable system is |
| 13 |
> U60(2x450); the unstable system is U2(2x400). Thanks for |
| 14 |
> catching this. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I can also add that my U2 (2x300) is also having the same lockup |
| 17 |
on high disk activity. I've been able to 'nice' my portage related |
| 18 |
activity down and avoid it crashing on the last few package emerges, |
| 19 |
but it's not a cure-all. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list |
Archives