Archives
Archives
| From: | Zhang Weiwu <zhangweiwu@××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Leif Sawyer <lsawyer@×××.com> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-sparc@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-sparc] what ultrasparc compare likely such Pentium bo x on desktop performance | ||
| Date: | Thu, 02 Dec 2004 09:18:45 | ||
| Message-Id: | 41AEDDEB.4020709@realss.com | ||
| In Reply to: | RE: [gentoo-sparc] what ultrasparc compare likely such Pentium bo x on desktop performance by Leif Sawyer |
||
| 1 | Leif Sawyer wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >Oh, I guess I should state that sloccount isn't marked for ~sparc, but |
| 4 | >compiles and works perfectly. Dunno if somebody wants to tag it. :-) |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | Yes I noticed it. Becuase sloccount is an purely console tool written in |
| 8 | standard language, I don't expect any trouble if I run it on sparc, so I |
| 9 | guess this is simple a mistake, or the ebuild maker doesn't test it |
| 10 | anyway. Currently I don't know how to tag or report this bug. I'll read |
| 11 | a bit the gentoo handbook to learn to contact those who is responsible. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | gentoo-sparc@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-sparc] what ultrasparc compare likely such Pentium bo x on desktop performance | Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o> |