1 |
We are not doing bridging, no. I'd contemplate that the issues are with 32bit |
2 |
interfaces not existing for it though. A solution would be to use a 64 bit |
3 |
static brctl binary. I'll see if I still have a 64 bit userland around. |
4 |
|
5 |
Josh |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
NADASI Peter wrote: |
9 |
>>We see the same problems with the V240 (same board, different case). Dave Miller |
10 |
>>(the linux sparc kernel maintainer) does not have access to a similar box, so at |
11 |
>>this point, Send Patches. We are having good luck with 2.4.32 except for a few |
12 |
>>minor issues. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> and can you make ethernet bridging with 2.4.3x ? |
15 |
> i compiled my kernel with the bridge support, downloaded the |
16 |
> bridge-utils v1.0.6 and it requires the 2.6.x series kernel headers :((( |
17 |
> since bridge-utils 1.x the 2.6.x kernel is needed... i think. |
18 |
> older 0.9.7 versions are compiled fine but i get this message: |
19 |
> |
20 |
> #./brctl addbr bri |
21 |
> Get bridge indices failed: Operation not supported |
22 |
> can't setup bridge control: Operation not supported |
23 |
> |
24 |
> if I compile it in module, i get the same :( |
25 |
> |
26 |
> has anyone experience using bridge in 2.4.x? |
27 |
> Peter |
28 |
> |
29 |
> |
30 |
>>>I'm running a SUN v210 with 2.4.32 fine but I have to make an ethernet |
31 |
>>>bridge and bridge-utils requires 2.6.x |
32 |
>>>I have compiled a lot of 2.6.x kernels, with udev, with devfs, etc.. but |
33 |
>>>everytime if the 2.6.x is booting, it freezes at: |
34 |
>>> |
35 |
>>>VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly. |
36 |
>>> |
37 |
>>>I don't see the usual INIT message, it doesn't start the boot runlevel. |
38 |
>>>It freezes very serious, I can reboot it only after a power-off. |
39 |
>>> |
40 |
>>>But if I boot with the 2.4.32 then it works pretty well!!! |
41 |
>>> |
42 |
>>>Have you met this problem earlier? |
43 |
>>>Any hints, ideas are welcome! |
44 |
>>>Best Regards, |
45 |
>>>Peter |
46 |
>>> |
47 |
>> |