| 1 |
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 08:28 -0500, Jameel Akari wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Ferris McCormick wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > However, U2-SMP(2x450) is not. As is the case with ALL 2.6.xx kernels, |
| 5 |
> > 2.6.15-r4 cannot handle the sort of disk activity which portage requires |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Just as a data point, you do realize that the 450MHz CPU was never |
| 8 |
> actually supported in the Ultra-2? While it may boot, it wasn't made to |
| 9 |
> work together nor was it sold as an upgrade. You may be tripping on some |
| 10 |
> marginal timing issue. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> If you have 400MHz/2MB CPUs sitting around it may be worth testing with |
| 13 |
> them to isolate that as a cause. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
As is too often the case, I mistyped. The stable system is U60(2x450); |
| 17 |
the unstable system is U2(2x400). Thanks for catching this. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> -- |
| 21 |
> #!/jameel/akari |
| 22 |
> sleep 4800; |
| 23 |
> make clean && make breakfast |
| 24 |
Regards, |
| 25 |
Ferris (who sometimes expects way too much ESP support from his readers) |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
| 28 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel) |
Archives