| 1 |
在 2006-06-25日的 23:20 +0200，Javier O. Augusto写道： |
| 2 |
> [..] |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > Ah, I get a good idea (good in sense of a newbie) If most of userland is |
| 5 |
> > 32bit on solaris too, the *some* applications in 64 bit are there |
| 6 |
> > perhaps because they perform better in 64-bit. If gimp-print/gutenprint |
| 7 |
> > package on solaris is 64-bit, that might shows Sun people think it can |
| 8 |
> > be in 64-bit mode. Sadly I cannot google out the package filename for |
| 9 |
> > gimp-print on solaris, usually in Linux binary package name often |
| 10 |
> > indicate if it is 32-bit or 64-bit |
| 11 |
> > (e.g. /suse/x86_64/libgimpprint-4.2.7-62.x86_64.rpm) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> You can try installing Solaris 10 Community Release (SXCR) on your box, then go after GCC-4.1 from Sun Downloads. This includes SPARC optimizations out of the box. Don't forget to read GCC docs about compiling on SPARC for better understanding flags differences. |
| 14 |
> For compiling, install automake autogen gmake gmk4 autoconf from blastwave.org thru `pkg-get`. |
| 15 |
> In your environment, set this flags before start `./configure`ing : |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> -- |
| 18 |
> PATH=/opt/SUNWspro/bin:/opt/onbld/bin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:\ |
| 19 |
> /usr/sfw/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/local/enlightenment/bin:/opt/csw/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/usr/openwin/bin :/usr/ccs/bin |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> CC=/opt/gcc/bin/gcc |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> CFLAGS='-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/sfw/include -I/opt/csw/include -m32 \ |
| 24 |
> -mcpu=ultrasparc -mtune=ultrasparc -O2' <- safe mode |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> LDFLAGS='-L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/sfw/lib -L/opt/csw/lib -R/usr/local/lib -R/usr/sfw/lib -R/opt/csw/lib' |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> alias tar='gtar' |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> alias make='gmake' |
| 31 |
> -- |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Don't forget to share your results. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Hope this helps.. Good luck. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Thank you! I would like to try it on July when I got more free time. |
| 38 |
Besides, now I am thinking people's suggestions are making good sense, |
| 39 |
probably it's right the print servre would not be faster after upgraded |
| 40 |
to 64-bit, because I took a glance into gutenprint source, the very part |
| 41 |
of eventone dithering (which from my limited knowledge is what computer |
| 42 |
busy doing for the printer) is about 700 lines of C source code, most |
| 43 |
variables are defined integer, which seems would not benifit from 64-bit |
| 44 |
processing. I would like to try 64-bit anyway. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
Thank you for all the help. |
Archives