1 |
Stuart Herbert wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> It shouldn't do. It's a common enough model, one used by many |
4 |
> professional and trade organisations. |
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
Sure. But we're doing this with volunteers, some of which we can't seem |
8 |
to get to speak up as it is, I'd hate to imagine the added task of |
9 |
tracking varying membership levels.. :P |
10 |
|
11 |
> Buying a membership has a different slant to it. Companies do it all |
12 |
> the time. It'd be even better if we could offer some form of |
13 |
> subscription, but right now I can't think of what we could offer in that |
14 |
> way. |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
It could remain an option for the future. But as Grant already pointed |
18 |
out, it was in the first proposed set of bylaws and was highly criticized. |
19 |
|
20 |
> I must have missed that. I would have sworn that this thread was about |
21 |
> who could apply for membership, rather than where to go and what to fill |
22 |
> out :P |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
Sorry, figuring out who could apply for membership is a prerequisite to |
26 |
opening up for membership applications. :) |
27 |
|
28 |
Cheers, |
29 |
|
30 |
-C |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Corey Shields |
34 |
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team and Devrel Team |
35 |
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
36 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields |
37 |
|
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |