Gentoo Archives: gentoo-trustees

From: Deedra Waters <dmwaters@g.o>
To: gentoo-trustees@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-trustees] copyright stuff
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 21:59:00
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.58.0507121452380.2378@shell.osuosl.org
1 I have a proposal that may keep everyone happy....
2
3 I talked with our lawyer today, and here's what i suggested.
4
5 1. We only worry about copyrighting code that gentoo actually owns,
6 mainly catalyst, portage, the installer and things like that.
7 Also any documentation that gentoo has written along with the utilities
8 that may have been written for portage etc etc.
9
10 2. it would be a co-ownership basically, meaning thatif i wrote
11 documentation or parts of documentation, i would retain the rights to
12 those docs, but gentoo owns the entire thing.
13
14 3. only gentoo would have the ability to sue. This is more a legal
15 thing, but basically it's so that if we ever had to go into law to
16 defend the copyright, the other person can't force us to drag all of
17 our developers into court.
18
19
20 Thoughts/comments please?
21
22 Personally, i think that this is probably the best choice, and it should
23 make everyone happy.
24
25
26 --
27 Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure -
28 dmwaters@g.o
29 Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org
30
31 --
32 gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-trustees] copyright stuff Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-trustees] copyright stuff Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-trustees] copyright stuff Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-trustees] copyright stuff Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o>