| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Saturday 08 May 2004 04:11 pm, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
<snip> |
| 7 |
> OK, but Corey, I am not just a "developer," and I also need to continue my |
| 8 |
> work to get this NFP set up, which is a process that takes time, and which |
| 9 |
> I am actively involved. I am also continuing to run the Gentoo store, |
| 10 |
> right? Store.gentoo.org, yes? Not many developers continue to run the |
| 11 |
> Gentoo Store, or are involved in setting up the official Gentoo NFP, are |
| 12 |
> they? So, is it in any way unreasonable or surprising that a gentoo.org |
| 13 |
> email address is a bit of a no-brainer here? Like I said earlier, maybe |
| 14 |
> it's best to get everything written down in an official agreement to avoid |
| 15 |
> any confusion. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I'm not arguing against you continuing the e-mail access.. Sorry if that |
| 18 |
wasn't clear in earlier e-mails. you're right, it is a no-brainer. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> > This sounds like more a misunderstanding or miscommunication |
| 21 |
> > of expectations to me, not a matter of acting in bad faith. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> OK, in that case, can you or Kurt put your email replies on hold and take |
| 24 |
> 5-10 seconds of your time to restore my access to dev.gentoo.org? I'm still |
| 25 |
> locked out. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I don't have access to do that, sorry. Aside from the e-mails I've just |
| 28 |
caught up with, I haven't heard from Kurt since he left Hong Kong. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
- -Corey |
| 31 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 32 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
iD8DBQFAnVC5pq/4o6MEFFMRAu8bAJ9r3aiNppSzSeaUn3uVm5pbKjHNlgCfe1rq |
| 35 |
QMpmsDZoiTaO3aOwi9m3Mew= |
| 36 |
=pys2 |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |
Archives