| 1 |
> So, I think that if we are making changes to the agreement, we need to dig a |
| 2 |
> bit deeper for guidelines that we should follow. Is everything negotiable, |
| 3 |
> but it needs to be agreed by both parties? Fine. Or are there some things |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
For me the above is true, everything is negotiable. I'm not entirely clear on |
| 6 |
the exact diferences between the two NFP forms and why we would want either of |
| 7 |
them. Personally I don't really care for myself except that I feel that while |
| 8 |
we still have the possibility we might want to try to look whether the current |
| 9 |
option is really the "best", including for your interest. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> that can be changed without the consent of the other party? If so, what |
| 12 |
> kinds of things fall into that category? Or should we just make a best |
| 13 |
> effort to meet each others needs and act in good faith? If so, then fine, |
| 14 |
> I'm willing to do that if you are willing to be fair and reciprocate. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> And again, I mean no offense at all by what I just said, I'm just being |
| 17 |
> honest about what I'm thinking. There are obvious ways that I could change |
| 18 |
> the agreement (even reasonable, low-impact to the NFP ways) to be more in |
| 19 |
> line with my interests. They're not critical, but you can always find ways |
| 20 |
> to make any agreement slightly better for one party or the other. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I don't think that any of us wants to damage your interests in any way. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Paul |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 28 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 29 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 30 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |
Archives