| 1 |
On Saturday 23 October 2004 11:39, Sven Vermeulen wrote: |
| 2 |
> What's our point in these cases? Do we allow the unmodified use of the G |
| 3 |
> logo within other logos for commercial purposes? Do we require certain |
| 4 |
> rules regarding "the other" logo (so that it's not just a circle around the |
| 5 |
> "g" logo) or do we rather not allow it at all? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Well, for really commercial purposes I don't think we should allow it before |
| 8 |
having consulted with Daniel, who currently runs the official shop. For |
| 9 |
non-profits or user groups I don't see many problems, but I would like to be |
| 10 |
able to approve on a case by case basis (also to ensure the non-commmercial |
| 11 |
nature). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
If the nature is semi-commercial I think we should also require a percentage |
| 14 |
of the price to flow back to the foundation (Yes, we need that bank account). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
For the "other logo" option, it depends for me. If it is a group that is |
| 17 |
clearly only about gentoo and non-profit, I wouldn't mind for the G to be |
| 18 |
quite prominent (for example a G with around it something like "Gentoo User |
| 19 |
Group The Netherlands"). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
In any case I think it is best that we know the price and contents of every |
| 22 |
produced t-shirt (or other similar item). |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Paul |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 28 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 29 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 30 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives