Gentoo Archives: gentoo-trustees

From: Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o>
To: gentoo-trustees@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] Daniel and Gentoo
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 21:34:12
Message-Id: 1084051875.5279.23.camel@sephora
In Reply to: [gentoo-trustees] Daniel and Gentoo by Seemant Kulleen
1 On Sat, 2004-05-08 at 14:28, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
2 > Folks & Fellow Trustees,
3 >
4 > I think this is getting rather silly. Daniel and Gentoo will forever be
5 > noted together. That's not something anybody can escape, especially not
6 > Daniel :P. And it's definitely NOT something Gentoo can escape. I
7 > honestly do not see why there's ANY kerfuffle about granting drobbins
8 > access to emu. He doesn't need, nor has he asked for any special privs
9 > on the account. Come on, people, just because he's left the project,
10 > does not give us license to be cold with him. I certainly hope Gentoo
11 > will continue to be the nice guys that we've been, and not the sort to
12 > say "we're not willing to continue to be nice to someone who has left."
13 > That's frankly disturbing and elitist.
14 >
15 > Love and kisses,
16
17 Hell, if it's THAT big an issue, let's make it our first vote, ffs.
18 Really, this is silly and petty, and we're beyond this.
19 --
20 Seemant Kulleen
21 http://dev.gentoo.org/~seemant
22
23 Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3458780E
24 Key fingerprint = 23A9 7CB5 9BBB 4F8D 549B 6593 EDA2 65D8 3458 780E

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-trustees] Daniel and Gentoo Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o>