Gentoo Archives: gentoo-trustees

From: Nicholas Jones <carpaski@g.o>
To: gentoo-trustees@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] FW: [gentoo-nfp] I met with my lawyer
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 18:11:44
Message-Id: 20040715181140.GA8794@twobit.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-trustees] FW: [gentoo-nfp] I met with my lawyer by Daniel Robbins
1 > Trade associations (unlike charities) can be more restrictive in their
2 > requirements for membership. Membership will be limited to Gentoo
3 > developers. The criteria for being a Gentoo developer will be determined by
4 > the board of trustees. There will be no membership dues.
5
6 Beyond the greater control over membership, is there any other
7 concern? As was mentioned, a subsidiary is quite possible, and
8 would you feel that option would fall under the same implied
9 right to change the agreement?
10
11 I'd like to think that you have a good reason that you have
12 yet to state the problem you have with this. It strikes me
13 as a bit odd that you want something more than a pretty
14 free run of the name and logos. Please do correct me,
15 thoughtfully, if I have it wrong.
16
17 The response to this as a threat is pretty much the only
18 way this can be looked at when there isn't a reason behind
19 that looming ultimatim of a contractual change.
20
21 A long, thought out explanation of your side would be my
22 suggestion. Forwarding more emails without actually saying
23 what's going on will just lead to more misunderstandings.
24
25 I'd rather have everything on hold for a day or more while
26 you think out what the problems you have with the changes
27 we might be considering, instead of letting things start to
28 boil over with misunderstanding.
29
30 --NJ

Replies

Subject Author
RE: [gentoo-trustees] FW: [gentoo-nfp] I met with my lawyer Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>