1 |
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 02:28:26PM -0700 or thereabouts, Seemant Kulleen wrote: |
2 |
> My question about the c3 status basically arises when we ponder "what |
3 |
> exactly makes Gentoo a charity?" Until we can come up with any sort of |
4 |
> satisfactory (and legally non-murky!) answer, I'll have to maintain that |
5 |
> c6 is where we need to be, anyway. |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
charity |
9 |
n 1: a foundation created to promote the public good (not for |
10 |
assistance to any particular individuals) |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
Our operating system is distributed freely and Freely. We allow and |
14 |
encourage others to take our work and build upon it for other purposes, |
15 |
without requiring any remuneration in return. |
16 |
|
17 |
We have a forum with 60,000 members and 1.3 million posts that helps people |
18 |
learn how to install, use, maintain and tweak Linux. We interface with the |
19 |
community in multiple different capacities: trade shows, mailing lists, |
20 |
LUGs, etc. |
21 |
|
22 |
As for legally murky, well, that's why we're seeking counsel! While I |
23 |
appreciate all the hard work that Daniel's lawyer has done for us over the |
24 |
years, he's not an expert in this particular field. It's entirely possible |
25 |
that he overlooked something or misunderstood a particularly complex piece |
26 |
of law. |
27 |
|
28 |
All we're doing here is seeking a second legal opinion. No decisions have |
29 |
been made. Our charter is to ensure we're making the best choice possible |
30 |
for our user base. I don't understand how we can be fulfilling our roles as |
31 |
Trustees without seeking this information. |
32 |
|
33 |
--kurt |