1 |
>> Again, this has been resolved in a thread weeks ago, so I |
2 |
>> don't see why it needs to be rehashed. The threat of |
3 |
>> punishment of our actions by changing your end of the deal is |
4 |
>> very unprofessional in my opinion. Is this going to extend |
5 |
>> to every trustees decision? If that possibility exists, |
6 |
>> maybe we need to take a closer look at the "agreed-upon plan". |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Did you interpret my email as a threat? Maybe you should re-read it? You |
9 |
> should really not interpret my email that way. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> I just forwarded some emails to the -trustees list. Give them a read. Then |
12 |
> read my emails again. |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
I don't think that it is a problem to consider reasonable requests from you to |
16 |
change parts of the agreement. I think this discussion went far in the wrong |
17 |
direction, part of it being initiated by us having forgotten what the main |
18 |
reason for c6 was. |
19 |
|
20 |
Paul |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Paul de Vrieze |
24 |
Gentoo Developer |
25 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
26 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |