| 1 |
I completely and utterly agree. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Kurt? |
| 4 |
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005, Daniel Ostrow wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:01:08 -0500 |
| 7 |
> From: Daniel Ostrow <dostrow@g.o> |
| 8 |
> To: Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> |
| 9 |
> Cc: gentoo-trustees@l.g.o |
| 10 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] copyright, take 3 |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 14:51 -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 13 |
> > Deedra Waters wrote: [Sat Nov 05 2005, 12:22:10PM CST] |
| 14 |
> > > The next step i believe is to present it to the devs. Does anyone have |
| 15 |
> > > any problems with my going ahead with this to keep things moving? |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > I'm certainly all for pushing it out to our devs. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I agree, we've all said all we have to say. Now it has to be up to the |
| 20 |
> community to accept, reject or modify it. I believe we have come up with |
| 21 |
> the best solution we can, the only thing that is going to be difficult |
| 22 |
> is convincing the community of the need for it (that and the fact that |
| 23 |
> the document lacks any sinister nature). |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Is there any way that we can get it posted to -core coming from the |
| 26 |
> trustees@ address...I think it would be far better if it was clear that |
| 27 |
> the document was coming from the trustees as a whole and not just one |
| 28 |
> individual. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> --Dan |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure - |
| 36 |
dmwaters@g.o |
| 37 |
Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |
Archives