1 |
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 16:08 -0700, Corey Shields wrote: |
2 |
> I don't have much time to explain this right this minute, but don't want to |
3 |
> hold this back from trustees being able to read and ponder it. This is the |
4 |
> agreement 2 FAQs that were given to Kurt and I by our legal counsel last |
5 |
> week, and we discussed this at length for a couple of hours. We need to |
6 |
> discuss if this is something we would like for our devs, and if so pitch it |
7 |
> to them later with the help (in terms of QA on a mailing list) with our |
8 |
> counsel. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> fyi, the agreement is a shortened, human-readable version of the actual |
11 |
> legaleze agreement. The agreement covers international issues in that in |
12 |
> case the jurisdiction does not recognize such a dual copyright, the signer |
13 |
> grants an irrevocable license to use the code, etc. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> the faq is 2-part: one for the developer side and one for the trustee side. |
16 |
> Brian put a lot of work into this, and I think covers a lot of bases. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I'll send a note explaining more later (feel free to chime in, Kurt).. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> -C |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
This looks really good to me. I just had to go through a copyright |
24 |
assignment with Novell for the Hula project and a lot of the wording is |
25 |
identical. I'm sending along the pdf that Novell uses (which I am sure |
26 |
that several very high paid lawyers vetted beforehand). |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Daniel Ostrow |
30 |
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
31 |
Gentoo/{PPC,PPC64,DevRel} |
32 |
dostrow@g.o |