On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 15:02, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 11:37:46AM -0400 or thereabouts, John Davis wrote:
> > Once we all read the developer's proposal, we could do a simple 2/3
> > supermajority vote or something similar.
> I would suggest tiering it. Something like the following:
> $0 - 500, 50% majority
> $501 - $2500, 66% majority
> $2501+, 80% majority
> Those dollar figures and percentages are strictly off the top of my head --
> my point is more that I think we should have *some* tiering rather than
> that should be the specific tiering that we use.
Makes sense to me, the more money, the more vote ;)
In response to Corey - doesn't PR already fulfill the role of the
fundraisers? Last I heard, they were the ones that contacted companies
for funds, hardware, and other resources, contacted institutions for our
server colos, and handled individual developer hardware requests.
Perhaps we could add some manpower and direction (not sure if they need
it though). Perhaps Swift and Klieber would be more qualified to
Gentoo Linux Developer
GnuPG Public Key: <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen/zhen_pub.asc>
Fingerprint: 2364 71BD 4BC2 705D F338 FF70 6650 1235 1946 2D47