Hi Deedra,

That would be fine. I just want "drobbins@g.o" to get to me; I
don't need Gentoo to provide me with a mail account, just a permanent
alias.

Regards,

Daniel

On Apr 12, 2005 3:17 PM, Deedra Waters <dmwaters@g.o> wrote:
> What if we just have an alias that forwards the mail so he does get the
> mail, but it's his responsibility to filter the mail through gmail, or
> what ever he uses on his end, along with what Paul suggested. My main
> thing here is that a while back he was using dev.g.o for specificly
> "managing his mail" or something to that effect. infra disabled his
> account, and that caused a lot of problems. Paul brings up a vallid
> point with the articles etc etc.
> 
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> 
> > Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 22:29:50 +0200
> > From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
> > Reply-To: gentoo-trustees@g.o
> > To: gentoo-trustees@g.o
> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] copyright transfer agreement
> >
> > On Tuesday 12 April 2005 22:20, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> > > Deedra Waters wrote: [Tue Apr 12 2005, 02:57:27PM CDT]
> > >
> > > > hrm, I'm probably going to upset daniel with this one, but this isn't my
> > > > intention...
> > > >
> > > > I don't think that he should have perminant use of drobbins@g.o,
> > > > I can see it while he's still using the store, but once the use of the
> > > > store is done with, there's no reason for him to keep it.
> > >
> > > I think there may be two different aspects of this issue.  One is
> > > drobbins using the drobbins@g.o address for new e-mails, which
> > > implicitly suggests that he is representing Gentoo.  Given that we
> > > control www.g.o, the forums, and the mailing lists, I personally believe
> > > that we should be able to counter any confusion that might arise, but I
> > > understand that some will disagree with me on principle.  The other
> > > issue is Daniel receiving mail that goes to drobbins@g.o.  That
> > > e-mail address is plastered all over the internet (especially in his
> > > Intel and IBM articles, not just associated with Gentoo proper), so I
> > > can certainly understand drobbins' desire to receive mail at that
> > > address.  Is there a reasonable compromise that may be reached (assuming
> > > that one is needed)?
> >
> > What about an abuse termination clause, that states that if he uses the
> > address to act as a gentoo developer/against the interests of the foundation
> > while in fact not being a member (he might rejoin) his right to use the email
> > address is lost (possibly after X warnings)
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure -
> dmwaters@g.o
> Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org
> 
> --
> gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list
> 
>
--
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list