1 |
Hi Deedra, |
2 |
|
3 |
That would be fine. I just want "drobbins@g.o" to get to me; I |
4 |
don't need Gentoo to provide me with a mail account, just a permanent |
5 |
alias. |
6 |
|
7 |
Regards, |
8 |
|
9 |
Daniel |
10 |
|
11 |
On Apr 12, 2005 3:17 PM, Deedra Waters <dmwaters@g.o> wrote: |
12 |
> What if we just have an alias that forwards the mail so he does get the |
13 |
> mail, but it's his responsibility to filter the mail through gmail, or |
14 |
> what ever he uses on his end, along with what Paul suggested. My main |
15 |
> thing here is that a while back he was using dev.g.o for specificly |
16 |
> "managing his mail" or something to that effect. infra disabled his |
17 |
> account, and that caused a lot of problems. Paul brings up a vallid |
18 |
> point with the articles etc etc. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
21 |
> |
22 |
> > Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 22:29:50 +0200 |
23 |
> > From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |
24 |
> > Reply-To: gentoo-trustees@l.g.o |
25 |
> > To: gentoo-trustees@l.g.o |
26 |
> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] copyright transfer agreement |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > On Tuesday 12 April 2005 22:20, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
29 |
> > > Deedra Waters wrote: [Tue Apr 12 2005, 02:57:27PM CDT] |
30 |
> > > |
31 |
> > > > hrm, I'm probably going to upset daniel with this one, but this isn't my |
32 |
> > > > intention... |
33 |
> > > > |
34 |
> > > > I don't think that he should have perminant use of drobbins@g.o, |
35 |
> > > > I can see it while he's still using the store, but once the use of the |
36 |
> > > > store is done with, there's no reason for him to keep it. |
37 |
> > > |
38 |
> > > I think there may be two different aspects of this issue. One is |
39 |
> > > drobbins using the drobbins@g.o address for new e-mails, which |
40 |
> > > implicitly suggests that he is representing Gentoo. Given that we |
41 |
> > > control www.g.o, the forums, and the mailing lists, I personally believe |
42 |
> > > that we should be able to counter any confusion that might arise, but I |
43 |
> > > understand that some will disagree with me on principle. The other |
44 |
> > > issue is Daniel receiving mail that goes to drobbins@g.o. That |
45 |
> > > e-mail address is plastered all over the internet (especially in his |
46 |
> > > Intel and IBM articles, not just associated with Gentoo proper), so I |
47 |
> > > can certainly understand drobbins' desire to receive mail at that |
48 |
> > > address. Is there a reasonable compromise that may be reached (assuming |
49 |
> > > that one is needed)? |
50 |
> > |
51 |
> > What about an abuse termination clause, that states that if he uses the |
52 |
> > address to act as a gentoo developer/against the interests of the foundation |
53 |
> > while in fact not being a member (he might rejoin) his right to use the email |
54 |
> > address is lost (possibly after X warnings) |
55 |
> > |
56 |
> > Paul |
57 |
> > |
58 |
> > |
59 |
> |
60 |
> -- |
61 |
> Deedra Waters - Gentoo developer relations, accessibility and infrastructure - |
62 |
> dmwaters@g.o |
63 |
> Gentoo linux: http://www.gentoo.org |
64 |
> |
65 |
> -- |
66 |
> gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |
67 |
> |
68 |
> |
69 |
-- |
70 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |