| 1 |
Deedra Waters wrote: [Tue Apr 12 2005, 02:57:27PM CDT] |
| 2 |
> hrm, I'm probably going to upset daniel with this one, but this isn't my |
| 3 |
> intention... |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I don't think that he should have perminant use of drobbins@g.o, |
| 6 |
> I can see it while he's still using the store, but once the use of the |
| 7 |
> store is done with, there's no reason for him to keep it. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I think there may be two different aspects of this issue. One is |
| 10 |
drobbins using the drobbins@g.o address for new e-mails, which |
| 11 |
implicitly suggests that he is representing Gentoo. Given that we |
| 12 |
control www.g.o, the forums, and the mailing lists, I personally believe |
| 13 |
that we should be able to counter any confusion that might arise, but I |
| 14 |
understand that some will disagree with me on principle. The other |
| 15 |
issue is Daniel receiving mail that goes to drobbins@g.o. That |
| 16 |
e-mail address is plastered all over the internet (especially in his |
| 17 |
Intel and IBM articles, not just associated with Gentoo proper), so I |
| 18 |
can certainly understand drobbins' desire to receive mail at that |
| 19 |
address. Is there a reasonable compromise that may be reached (assuming |
| 20 |
that one is needed)? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-g2boojum- |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Grant Goodyear |
| 25 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 26 |
g2boojum@g.o |
| 27 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
| 28 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |
Archives