Deedra Waters wrote: [Tue Apr 12 2005, 02:57:27PM CDT]
> hrm, I'm probably going to upset daniel with this one, but this isn't my
> intention...
> 
> I don't think that he should have perminant use of drobbins@g.o,
> I can see it while he's still using the store, but once the use of the
> store is done with, there's no reason for him to keep it.

I think there may be two different aspects of this issue.  One is
drobbins using the drobbins@g.o address for new e-mails, which
implicitly suggests that he is representing Gentoo.  Given that we
control www.g.o, the forums, and the mailing lists, I personally believe
that we should be able to counter any confusion that might arise, but I
understand that some will disagree with me on principle.  The other
issue is Daniel receiving mail that goes to drobbins@g.o.  That
e-mail address is plastered all over the internet (especially in his
Intel and IBM articles, not just associated with Gentoo proper), so I
can certainly understand drobbins' desire to receive mail at that
address.  Is there a reasonable compromise that may be reached (assuming
that one is needed)?

-g2boojum-
-- 
Grant Goodyear	
Gentoo Developer
g2boojum@g.o
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0  9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76