| 1 |
On Sunday 22 May 2005 22:11, Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> To me this would put the donation in more of a contributor rank and |
| 4 |
> file. Any information about the company would only show on the sponsor |
| 5 |
> page (plus a GWN article most likely thanking for their contribution). |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> For example, the IBM donation that corey mentioned about. It's best to |
| 8 |
> put the acknowledgement for that on the sponsors page. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I think we should devise categories of sponsorship. Further we should |
| 11 |
properly record all sponsors/contributors and what we should do in |
| 12 |
return. Categories do not need to be time based, but if someone does a |
| 13 |
one time contribution they should be removed from the sponsor list after |
| 14 |
a reasonable time depending on the contribution. They might have a choice |
| 15 |
there in "high exposure for a short time" versus "lower exposure for a |
| 16 |
longer time" |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Paul |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 22 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 23 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 24 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives