1 |
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 11:37:46AM -0400 or thereabouts, John Davis wrote: |
2 |
> Once we all read the developer's proposal, we could do a simple 2/3 |
3 |
> supermajority vote or something similar. |
4 |
|
5 |
I would suggest tiering it. Something like the following: |
6 |
|
7 |
$0 - 500, 50% majority |
8 |
$501 - $2500, 66% majority |
9 |
$2501+, 80% majority |
10 |
|
11 |
Those dollar figures and percentages are strictly off the top of my head -- |
12 |
my point is more that I think we should have *some* tiering rather than |
13 |
that should be the specific tiering that we use. |
14 |
|
15 |
--kurt |