Gentoo Archives: gentoo-trustees

From: Nicholas Jones <carpaski@g.o>
To: gentoo-trustees@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] Bylaws & 501(c)(3) filing
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:44:18
Message-Id: 20040629224346.GA29830@twobit.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-trustees] Bylaws & 501(c)(3) filing by Deedra Waters
1 > I thought we were filing for 501c6?
2 > As I recall, that's what we were set up to do?
3
4 That is what Daniel began the filings for, yes.
5
6 c6 is a trade association, while c3 is a charity or something
7 to that effect. The trade associate does not have any tax
8 benefit for donations and thus doesn't lend to much interest
9 in massive donations. The ability to write off a product at
10 it's marketed price for tax purposes is nice.
11
12 I believe the reasons Daniel stated for getting C6 as opposed
13 to C3 was that it is more legitimate. There are a lot of filing
14 for C3 status that are not legitimate, but do get approved
15 even without being a for-charity association.
16
17 Seeking more legal opinion on our chances of this is WELL
18 worth the cost, in my opinion. We are _far_ more legitimate
19 than many of the types of groups that are appoved of regularly.
20 Strictly speaking, Gentoo isn't a charity, but if we are
21 approved and don't pose a for the status to be removed
22 from us, I don't see a problem with it.
23
24 --NJ

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-trustees] Bylaws & 501(c)(3) filing Deedra Waters <dmwaters@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-trustees] Bylaws & 501(c)(3) filing Corey Shields <cshields@g.o>