List Archive: gentoo-trustees
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
Kurt Lieber wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:06:01PM -0400 or thereabouts, Aron Griffis wrote:
>>Do you want
>> # Copyright 1999-2004 Gentoo Foundation
>> # Copyright 1999-2004 Gentoo Foundation, Inc.
>>I would think the former, but don't want to make changes without
>>knowing which is better.
>I think the former is fine as well. Given the complete lack of silence
>from everyone else on this topic, I'd say nobody else cares, either. ;)
Just out of curiousity does it make sense to say the copywrite from
gentoo foundation is from 1999-2004? the gentoo foundation didn't exist
in 1999? is that a legal way to do it or should it be
Copywrite 1999-2003 Gentoo Technologies
Copywrite 2004 Gentoo Foundation
I'm not up on copywrite law so I don't know the answer (thus why i'm
posting) but it doesn't make sense to me that something can hold a
copywrite in a year it didn't exist
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list