Kurt Lieber wrote:

>On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:06:01PM -0400 or thereabouts, Aron Griffis wrote:
>  
>
>>Do you want
>>
>>    # Copyright 1999-2004 Gentoo Foundation
>>
>>or
>>
>>    # Copyright 1999-2004 Gentoo Foundation, Inc.
>>
>>I would think the former, but don't want to make changes without
>>knowing which is better.
>>    
>>
>
>I think the former is fine as well.  Given the complete lack of silence
>from everyone else on this topic, I'd say nobody else cares, either. ;)
>
>--kurt
>  
>
Just out of curiousity does it make sense to say the copywrite from 
gentoo foundation is from 1999-2004? the gentoo foundation didn't exist 
in 1999? is that a legal way to do it or should it be

Copywrite 1999-2003 Gentoo Technologies
Copywrite 2004 Gentoo Foundation

?

I'm not up on copywrite law so I don't know the answer (thus why i'm 
posting) but it doesn't make sense to me that something can hold a 
copywrite in a year it didn't exist


Joshua Brindle

--
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list