1 |
PR doesn't do any fundraising AFAIK. This is going to be one of the main |
2 |
purposes of the new board of trustees as Daniel has mentioned before. |
3 |
|
4 |
Cheers! |
5 |
|
6 |
-C |
7 |
|
8 |
-----Original Message----- |
9 |
From: John Davis [mailto:zhen@g.o] |
10 |
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 11:53 PM |
11 |
To: gentoo-trustees@l.g.o |
12 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-trustees] How are we going to spend money? |
13 |
|
14 |
On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 15:02, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
15 |
> On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 11:37:46AM -0400 or thereabouts, John Davis wrote: |
16 |
> > Once we all read the developer's proposal, we could do a simple 2/3 |
17 |
> > supermajority vote or something similar. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I would suggest tiering it. Something like the following: |
20 |
> |
21 |
> $0 - 500, 50% majority |
22 |
> $501 - $2500, 66% majority |
23 |
> $2501+, 80% majority |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Those dollar figures and percentages are strictly off the top of my |
26 |
> head -- my point is more that I think we should have *some* tiering |
27 |
> rather than that should be the specific tiering that we use. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> --kurt |
30 |
|
31 |
Makes sense to me, the more money, the more vote ;) |
32 |
|
33 |
In response to Corey - doesn't PR already fulfill the role of the |
34 |
fundraisers? Last I heard, they were the ones that contacted companies for |
35 |
funds, hardware, and other resources, contacted institutions for our server |
36 |
colos, and handled individual developer hardware requests. |
37 |
Perhaps we could add some manpower and direction (not sure if they need it |
38 |
though). Perhaps Swift and Klieber would be more qualified to comment. |
39 |
|
40 |
Cheers, |
41 |
-- |
42 |
John Davis |
43 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
44 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen> |
45 |
|
46 |
---- |
47 |
GnuPG Public Key: <http://dev.gentoo.org/~zhen/zhen_pub.asc> |
48 |
Fingerprint: 2364 71BD 4BC2 705D F338 FF70 6650 1235 1946 2D47 |
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
-- |
53 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |