1 |
I've mentioned this before but didn't receive much response, so I'll |
2 |
mention it again. |
3 |
|
4 |
Our copyright assignment doc needs to change. Specific problems with it: |
5 |
|
6 |
* It claims ownership of developer hard drives "...or computer media |
7 |
relating to the Work.") |
8 |
* It says "Gentoo Technologies" instead of "Gentoo Foundation" |
9 |
* It is completely unenforceable for any user (non-dev) that submits |
10 |
something to bugzilla and/or submissions@g.o. (we're not |
11 |
requiring them to sign this doc, so it's not enforceable) |
12 |
* Because we allow the storage things like kernel patches, etc. for which |
13 |
we do not own the copyright, in CVS (in the files/ directories), it shows |
14 |
that we're selectively enforcing the copyright assignment. In the past, |
15 |
this has often resulted in the entire document being tossed in court. |
16 |
* It is questionable whether or not we have any legal right to enforce |
17 |
copyright claims for non-US devs. They're not US citizens, so it's not |
18 |
clear if they're subject to US copyright restrictions/assignments. |
19 |
* We selectively enforce who must sign it. |
20 |
* [minor] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/copyright/index.xml needs to |
21 |
be updated to remove Daniel from the text. |
22 |
|
23 |
There are a number of ways to solve this. One set of suggestions: |
24 |
|
25 |
* Eliminate the "...or computer media" clause. |
26 |
* s/Gentoo Technologies/Gentoo Foundation/g |
27 |
* Not sure, but it's something we need to resolve. |
28 |
* Some how find a way to allow storage of files/ files in CVS for which we |
29 |
cannot legally claim copyright on. I'm open to suggestions on how to |
30 |
best do this. |
31 |
* Seek legal counsel on the merit of this document wrt non-US-based devs. |
32 |
* Either have *everyone* sign it or *no one* sign it. |
33 |
* [minor] fix the copyright FAQ page. |
34 |
|
35 |
Until we change this doc, I would like to stop having new devs sign it. It |
36 |
is causing a number of problems, confusion and general unhappiness on |
37 |
#gentoo-dev. I don't think it provides a net benefit to Gentoo as it reads |
38 |
now, (for the reasons outlined above) so I don't see the reason for |
39 |
requiring it. |
40 |
|
41 |
Thoughts, opinions, flames, etc. |
42 |
|
43 |
--kurt |