| 1 |
Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Don't mean any personal disrespect, but you're joking, right? We're an |
| 4 |
> organisation of over 300 developers, and between us we can't automate a |
| 5 |
> membership management system? C'mon, that's the sort of thing they give |
| 6 |
> to kids at school aged 15 as schoolwork. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
No, I wasn't joking. You get the current trustees to all speakup on the |
| 10 |
issues that we have been trying to discuss as of late and I'll go along |
| 11 |
with your idea. No matter how automated you make it there will still be |
| 12 |
a human aspect involved, and that is where I see the lack of resources. |
| 13 |
I have hope that this will change in the future. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> Sorry, I haven't seen Grant's email saying that (unless it was in an |
| 16 |
> older thread). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
It may have gone to -core.. there were many different cc's at the |
| 20 |
beginning of this. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> ~From the lack of response to this thread, I guess most Gentoo devs |
| 23 |
> really don't care. Maybe we should have mandatory voting? If you don't |
| 24 |
> vote, you can't be a dev. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
With mandatory voting you have the same problems as with a quorum vote. |
| 28 |
Some people just won't vote. If you hold a vote that has to wait for |
| 29 |
all members to submit their mandatory ballot, it will never close. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Cheers, |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-C |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Corey Shields |
| 37 |
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team and Devrel Team |
| 38 |
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
| 39 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |
Archives