| 1 |
On Thursday 01 July 2004 15:40, Corey Shields wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:37 am, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Regardless of whether or not it's enforceable, I think enough devs |
| 4 |
> > have expressed concern about the things it purports to enforce. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > IMO, we should heed those concerns, stop requiring new devs to sign |
| 7 |
> > the doc and figure out a way to get a better doc in place. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> There is really no reason to continue signing copyright over to Gentoo |
| 10 |
> Technologies, so until this all changes to the new Foundation, I have |
| 11 |
> to agree with putting these on hold, with the agreement that they will |
| 12 |
> be signing one later. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Appart from the fact that enough people (including trustees (myself |
| 15 |
included)) have not actually signed the statement, the statement is |
| 16 |
indeed broken so I agree on postponing it. Also we might not need the |
| 17 |
whole copyright. The only thing we want to be able to do is to fight |
| 18 |
battles in court without having to make many many party in the battle. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Paul |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 24 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 25 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 26 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives