| 1 |
On Saturday 05 November 2005 10:22 am, Deedra Waters wrote: |
| 2 |
> From the past emails, it seems as though the general consensis with the |
| 3 |
> exception of 2 people is that everyone seems to like and is ready to go |
| 4 |
> with what the lawyers and corey and kurt put together. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> The next step i believe is to present it to the devs. Does anyone have |
| 7 |
> any problems with my going ahead with this to keep things moving? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
We need to inform our counsel that we are ready to present it to the devs. |
| 10 |
The one who drafted the document is willing to be involved in talks with the |
| 11 |
devs personally rather than us play telephone between him and the dev |
| 12 |
community. This means he'll need to be in on the mailing list. And, |
| 13 |
speaking of said list, discussions on the copyright proposal will need to |
| 14 |
remain PRIVATE at the requirement of our counsel until they are finalized to |
| 15 |
protect our status with our legal counsel. This means no blog ranting or |
| 16 |
cross-posting of discussions. I believe when we were discussing this with |
| 17 |
them the idea that was brought up between Kurt and I was to create a new |
| 18 |
mailing list for these discussions. Anyone who violates the privacy of the |
| 19 |
discussion faces immediate suspension (and there will be people who do this. |
| 20 |
sucks to be them.) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
If we want to get this ball rolling that's great. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Cheers, |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-C |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-trustees@g.o mailing list |
Archives